For the first time in American history, a federal judge last week authorized the government to admit as evidence in a criminal case in a public courtroom words uttered by the defendant that were obtained under torture.
The fruits of torture — which is any cruel or degrading or intentionally painful or disorienting behavior visited upon a person in captivity to induce compliance or to gratify the torturer — are not permitted in any court in the United States, and their inducement is criminal.
Here is the backstory .
Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, a low-level former member of the Taliban, is accused with others of plotting the suicide bombing of the USS Cole in October 2000 that killed 17 American sailors. He has been in U.S. custody since 2002 and at the U.S. Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, since 2004. When he was first captured, he was turned over to the CIA for interrogation, not the Department of Justice for prosecution.
The practice of the federal government immediately following 9/11, when it captured anyone overseas from whom it believed it could extract national security information, was to hand the person over to the CIA for torture — the feds call it “enhanced interrogation” — at a “dark site” in a foreign country with which the U.S. does not have an extradition treaty.
The reason for the location of the torture was the erroneous belief by DOJ and CIA officials that torture conducted or condoned by American personnel is not prosecutable if it occurs outside the U.S.
That has never been the law in the U.S., but it has been the practice of the DOJ and the CIA to shield their personnel with secrecy when they are caught engaging in torture in a foreign country.
However, because either the tortured person or someone connected to whatever the tortured person revealed was to be tried in a federal court, and because no federal court can admit evidence against a defendant that was obtained under torture, the feds devised a scheme around this.
That scheme called for FBI “clean teams” to interrogate the tortured person after the torture was completed, using conventional and lawful interrogation techniques. These techniques often proved more successful than CIA torture. Because these techniques were lawful, and the person being interrogated was advised of his rights and treated humanely by the FBI, the information thus obtained from him was usable in federal court.
At trial, a defendant can always demonstrate that he had been tortured, not to obtain the jury's sympathy but to enable his lawyers to argue to the jurors that they should disregard as unconstitutional, immoral, unlawful and un-American whatever evidence the torture produced.
Al-Nashiri's lawyers told the court and the prosecutors at Guantanamo Bay that they intend to argue at trial to the jury that the government has the wrong man and that the true plotters have already been killed by U.S. forces. The feds, in order to counter that argument, told the court that they have statements that al-Nashiri made during his torture that can arguably be used to question his defense.
If the trial judge in the court in Guantanamo Bay had followed the law — the Constitution, the statutes and the rules of procedure, all of which profoundly reject the fruits of cruel and unusual punishment and shocking behavior — as well as American history, he would have excluded from the trial whatever al-Nashiri told his torturers while they had a broomstick well into his rectum.
If the trial judge had followed the law and our values, he would have dismissed the case against al-Nashiri because the government's behavior shocks the conscience. If the trial judge had followed the law, he would have ordered the torturers into his court room and had them arrested on the spot.
But the trial judge in this case did not follow American law and rejected American values and all sense of human decency when he authorized the government to introduce at trial a partial transcript of the statements al-Nashiri allegedly made under torture. He also broke with 230 years of precedent. He also gave judicial credibility to governmental barbarism and nihilism in the extreme, which holds that individual human beings are subject to the state and, since their rights come from the state, they and their rights exist at the pleasure of the state.
The government lies, cheats, steals and kills; and it has written laws that permit it to do so and make legal recourse against it nearly impossible.
But nothing it does is more damnable than torture.
Torture is the ultimate triumph of the state over a person and the ultimate degradation of personhood. It is a complete rejection of the values of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. And it doesn't work.
The history of torture is the history of victims divorced from reality by overwhelming fear and unbearable pain and willing to say whatever the torturers demand in return for a cessation of the pain. Stated differently, the fruits of torture are divorced from the truth. As a truth-producing mechanism, torture is a failure.
Many appeals remain for al-Nashiri before his jury trial comes to pass; and torture — with all its sufferings by victim and perpetrators — is part of the history of his case. I trust that saner judicial heads in the appellate process will prevail and this precedent-shattering and monstrous decision will soon be overturned. But its damage is done.
The government of the United States engages in torture and will continue to do so until the torturers are punished. And the prosecutors for whom the torturers work will someday try again to get the fruits of their barbaric behavior legitimized in an American courtroom.
When will the government stop the use of torture? Whom will it torture next? Why does it swear to uphold the Constitution and then trash it?
- WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange protected by first amendment: Judge Napolitano
- DNC suit against Trump campaign a possible distraction: Judge Napolitano
- Supreme Court will uphold ObamaCare: Judge Napolitano
- ObamaCare ruling should be upheld by Supreme Court: Judge Napolitano
- American lawsuits over Google's Nest may not be viable, Judge Napolitano says
- Brennan may have set his own perjury trap: Judge Napolitano
- How the government is stealing your money, according to Judge Napolitano
- AT&T-Time Warner ruling sets precedent for Comcast-Disney bidding war: Judge Nap
- Trump has authority to pardon Huawei CFO to close China trade deal: Judge Napolitano
- Apple to win antitrust lawsuit over app store monopoly: Judge Napolitano
- New York lawsuit against Exxon a 'shakedown': Judge Napolitano
- Legal sports betting: NFL, NBA call for federal regulation
|Texaco "Fire Chief" TugBoat Bank 2000 First in a Series by ERTL (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|Disney Holiday Princess Special Edition: Cinderella Doll - First in a Series - (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|Breyer 9195 Camila-springtime Filly First in a Series, New 1:6 Scale Extensive White Marking Version (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|Barbie Millennium Wedding The Bridal Collection Doll - African American - First in a Series (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|Victorian Dollhouse 1984 Hallmark Keepsake Ornament First in a series of Nostalgic Houses and Shops (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|Birthday Wishes Barbie Collector Edition - First in a Series (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|BARBIE GOLD SENSATION LIMITED EDITION FIRST IN A SET SERIAL # 00345 (1993 TIMELESS CREATIONS) by Mattel by Mattel (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|Spring Blossom Barbie - (First in a Series) (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|The Elvis Presley Collection Classic Edition Doll First in a Series Collector Edition (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|Elvis Doll: First in a Series Collector Edition (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|Kahr P-380 Pocket Holster ***MADE IN U.S.A.*** (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|SINGLE MAGAZINE POUCH FOR WALTHER P-99; SP-22 ***MADE IN THE U.S.A.*** (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|DOUBLE MAGAZINE POUCH FOR WALTHER P-99; SP-22 ***MADE IN THE U.S.A.*** (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|Alpro ''P 180'' from Birko-Flor in Black with a narrow insole (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|First in a Field of One (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|LIVE 1-2 FT PLANT!!! P. Nigra Jet Black Bamboo, in a 1 Gallon Pot! Mature Plant Div. Evergreen! Cold Hardy! (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|LIVE 1-2 FT PLANT!!! P. Aurea "Fishing Pole" Bamboo, in a 1 Gallon Pot! Mature Plant Div. Evergreen! Cold Hardy! (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|C.A.P XGC-1E Xtreme All-In-One Greenhouse Controller - Co2, Lights, Exhaust, etc (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|Multiple Colors & Sizes - 12pc High P. Lavender/Purple Luxury Bed-in-a-Bag - California King Comforter Set (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|G-Dragon of Bigbang #A POSTER 23.5 x 34 Korean boy band Big Bang Top Tae Tang T.O.P. Kpop (sent FROM USA in PVC pipe) (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|The Geek Baby Book: A Memory Journal for Every Geeky First in Your Baby's Life (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|Blue Avenue: First in a noir mystery series set in Jacksonville, Florida (A Daniel Turner Mystery) (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|Pathfinder: First In, Last Out: A Memoir of Vietnam (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|Hypnotic States of Americans: A spiritual survival manual for every American family in a perilous world (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|Letters From The Road (This is the first in a trilogy) (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|ANDREW POTATO FACE - a children's book to encourage healthy eating in fussy little eaters (Beginner reader, Early learning) (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|Feckenmeyer's Mailbox: A Dick Stranger Crime Novel (First in the Dick Stranger Series) (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|A Mormon in the White House?: 10 Things Every American Should Know about Mitt Romney (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|Lonely Street: A Bubba Mabry P.I. Mystery (First in the Bubba Mabry P.I. Mystery Series) (check at Amazon)||0.0|
|A Winner by Any Standard: A Personal Growth Journey for Every American Teen (check at Amazon)||0.0|
Judge Andrew P. Napolitano: A dangerous first in a federal courtroom should give every American pause have 1742 words, post on www.foxnews.com at June 10, 2021. This is cached page on USA Posts. If you want remove this page, please contact us.